Skip to Primary Navigation

Skip to main content

FCA v BlueCrest Capital Management: Implications for regulated firms

Montage of the FCA sign
GRIP Montage: FCA

Robert Dedman | CMS, Simon Morris | CMS, Kushal Gandhi | CMS+1

3 min read
 Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window/tab)

Court of Appeal addresses the scope of the FCA’s powers under FSMA to impose redress requirements on firms and the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal.

On October 2, 2024, the Court of Appeal delivered a significant judgment in the case of Financial Conduct Authority v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP ([2024] EWCA Civ 1125).

This decision addresses:

  • the scope of the FCA’s powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) to impose redress requirements on
  • the
, , , , , , , , ,

Get full access, free for a month

Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and access
all content on GRIP – no payment details required.

Start free trial Sign in

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience